Proposed South Carolina Law
from
Senator David L. Thomas
Website:
http://www.scstatehouse.net/sess116_2005-2006/bills/959.htm
on
January 2, 2006
View comments about this article!
Please familiarize yourself with South Carolina's proposed bill that will outlaw private ownership of any venomous snake and even many constrictors. The law grandfathers in animals currently in possession, but charges a $50 filing fee per animal annually. Ultimately, when these animals die, that's it. They cannot be replaced. I have provided contact information within this article. ~webmaster
Authored by Senator David L. Thomas, Attorney Dist. No. 8 - Greenville Co. (H) 23 Wade Hampton Blvd., Greenville, 29609 Bus. (864) 271-6371 Home (C) 410 Gressette Bldg., Columbia, 29202 Bus. (803) 212-6240
http://www.scstatehouse.net/html-pages/senatemembers.html
TO AMEND TITLE 47, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO ANIMALS, LIVESTOCK, AND POULTRY, BY ADDING CHAPTER 2 WHICH ENACTS THE "EXOTIC ANIMAL CONTROL AND REGULATION ACT", SO AS TO DEFINE EXOTIC ANIMAL AS THOSE SPECIES OF ANIMALS THAT ARE INHERENTLY DANGEROUS TO HUMANS AND TO EXEMPT SPECIFIC ANIMALS AND CERTAIN ENTITIES POSSESSING EXOTIC ANIMALS; TO PROHIBIT A PERSON FROM OWNING OR POSSESSING AN EXOTIC ANIMAL UNLESS THE PERSON WAS IN LEGAL POSSESSION OF THE ANIMAL BEFORE THIS ACT'S EFFECTIVE DATE AND THE PERSON OBTAINS A PERSONAL POSSESSION PERMIT FOR THE EXOTIC ANIMAL WITHIN NINETY DAYS OF THIS ACT'S EFFECTIVE DATE; TO ESTABLISH IDENTIFICATION, CAGING, CARE AND TREATMENT, AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS; TO PROHIBIT PUBLIC CONTACT WITH AN EXOTIC ANIMAL; TO AUTHORIZE INSPECTIONS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; TO AUTHORIZE CONFISCATION OF THESE ANIMALS UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS; AND TO PROVIDE PENALTIES.
Whereas, it is the intent of the South Carolina General Assembly to protect the public against health and safety risks that exotic animals pose to the community and to protect the welfare of the individual animals held in private possession. By their very nature, these animals are wild and inherently dangerous and, as such, do not adjust well to a captive environment. Now therefore,
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Title 47 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:
Exotic Animal Control and Regulation
Section 47-2-10. This chapter may be cited as the 'Exotic Animal Control and Regulation Act'.
Section 47-2-20. As used in this chapter:
(1) 'Department' means the Department of Natural Resources.
(2) 'Exotic animal' means those species of animals that are inherently dangerous to humans. Exotic animals include, but are not limited to, the following orders and families, whether bred in the wild or in captivity, and any or all hybrids. The animals listed in parentheses are intended to act as examples and are not to be construed as an exhaustive list or limit the generality of each group of animals, unless otherwise specified:
(i) order artiodactyla (hippopotamuses, giraffes, camels, and deer but not cattle, swine, sheep, or goats);
A. family felidae (lions, tigers, cougars, leopards, ocelots, and servals but not domestic cats);
B. family canidae (wolves, coyotes, foxes, and jackals but not domestic dogs);
C. family ursidae (all bears);
D. family mustelidae (weasels, skunks, martins, and minks but not ferrets);
E. family procyonidae (raccoons and coatis);
F. family hyaenidae (hyenas);
G. family viverridae (civets, genets, and mongooses);
(iii) order edentatia (anteaters, armadillos, and sloths);
(iv) order marsupialia (opossums, kangaroos, and wallabies but not sugar gliders);
(v) order perissodactyla (rhinoceroses and tapirs but not horses, donkeys, or mules);
(vi) order primates (lemurs, monkeys, chimpanzees, and gorillas);
(vii) order proboscidae (elephants);
(viii) order rodentia (squirrels, beavers, and porcupines but not guinea pigs, rats, mice, gerbils, or hamsters);
A. family boidae (only African rock pythons, amethystine pythons, boelen's pythons, burmese pythons, Indian pythons, olive pythons, reticulated pythons, yellow anacondas, green anacondas, and Jamaican boas);
B. family colubridae (only boomslangs, mangrove snakes, African twig snakes, and brown tree snakes);
C. family elapidae (coral snakes, cobras, and mambas);
D. family helodermatidae (venomous lizards);
E. family lacertilia (Salvator monitors and Salvadoran monitors);
F. family viperidae (copperheads, cottonmouths, and rattlesnakes);
(ii) order crocodilia (crocodiles, alligators, caimans, and gavials);
(c) All species listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act as threatened or endangered are considered an exotic animal.
(d) Species not listed may be declared as an exotic animal by the department if the confinement of the animal within the State can be shown to constitute a threat to public health and safety.
(3) 'Person' means an individual, partnership, corporation, organization, trade or professional association, firm, limited liability company, joint venture, association, trust, estate or any other legal entity and any officer, member, shareholder, director, employee, agent, or representative of these.
(4) 'Possessor' means a person who owns, harbors, or has custody or control of an exotic animal.
(5) 'Wildlife sanctuary' means a nonprofit organization described in Section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) of the Internal Revenue Code, as defined in Section 12-6-40(A), and its subsequent amendments, that operates a place of refuge where abused, neglected, unwanted, impounded, abandoned, orphaned, or displaced exotic animals are provided care for their lifetime or released back to their natural habitat and, with respect to any animal owned by the organization, does not:
(a) conduct any activity that is not inherent to the animal's nature;
(b) use the animal for any type of entertainment;
(c) sell, trade, or barter the animal or the animal's body parts; or
(d) breed the animal for purposes of sale.
Section 47-2-30. (A) A person may not own, possess, keep, harbor, bring, or have in his possession an exotic animal, except in compliance with this chapter.
(B) A possessor or any other person in control of a lot, tract, or parcel of land or any residence or business premises situated on that land may not knowingly permit any other person to be in possession of an exotic animal upon the property, residence, or premises, except in compliance with this chapter.
(C) A person may not breed an exotic animal, except in compliance with this chapter.
Section 47-2-40. This chapter does not apply to:
(1) institutions accredited by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association;
(2) registered nonprofit humane societies;
(3) animal control officers or law enforcement officers acting under the authority of this chapter;
(4) veterinary hospitals or clinics;
(5) a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the State;
(6) a wildlife sanctuary;
(7) a licensed or accredited research or medical institution;
(8) a licensed or accredited educational institution;
(9) a circus, rodeo, or trade show;
(10) a person temporarily transporting an exotic animal through the State if the transit time is not more than ninety-six hours and the animal is at all times maintained within a confinement sufficient to prevent the exotic animal from escaping.
Section 47-2-50. (A) A person may possess an exotic animal only if:
(1) the person was in legal possession of the exotic animal as of July 1, 2006, and is the legal possessor of the exotic animal; and
(2) the person applies for and is granted a personal possession permit for each exotic animal in the person's possession before October 1, 2006.
(B) A person who meets the requirements of subsection (A) annually shall obtain a personal possession permit.
(C) An applicant shall submit an annual permit fee of fifty dollars for each animal and shall file an application to receive a personal possession permit with the department on forms provided by the department. The application shall include:
(1) the name, address, and telephone number of the applicant;
(2) a description of each exotic animal, including the scientific name, common name, sex, age, color, weight, and any distinguishing marks or coloration that would aid in the identification of the animal;
(3) a photograph of the exotic animal;
(4) the exact location where the exotic animal is to be kept;
(5) the name, address, and telephone number of the person from whom the applicant obtained the exotic animal, if known;
(6) the identification number of the exotic animal, excluding exotic animals excepted under Section 47-2-70;
(7) the name, address, and phone number of the veterinarian who is expected to provide veterinary care to the exotic animal.
The person shall submit any additional information the department considers necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
(D) A permit may not be granted unless the department finds that:
(1) the applicant has complied with all of the requirements of subsection (A);
(2) the applicant is eighteen years of age or older;
(3) the applicant has not been convicted of or found responsible for violating a local or state law prohibiting cruelty, neglect, or mistreatment of an animal or has not within the past ten years been convicted of a felony or been convicted for possession, sale, or use of illegal narcotics;
(4) the facility and the conditions in which the exotic animal will be kept are in compliance with this chapter;
(5) the applicant has obtained the requisite liability insurance coverage for the exotic animal under the applicant's control as set forth in Section 47-2-100;
(6) the applicant has regularly provided veterinary care to the exotic animal when needed and intends to provide such care in the future.
(E) The personal possession permit shall set forth:
(1) the name, address, and phone number of the permit holder;
(2) the address, if different than item (1), where the exotic animal will be kept;
(3) the name, number, species, age of the exotic animal, and any distinguishing marks or coloration that would aid in the identification of the animal;
(4) the identification number as required under Section 47-2-70, if applicable;
(5) the name, address, and phone number of the veterinarian who is expected to provide veterinary care to the exotic animal named on the permit;
(6) any other relevant information the department considers necessary.
(F) The department shall keep records of who has been issued a personal possession permit. A permit holder shall notify the department of any changes of the stated information on the permit, including the death of the exotic animal.
Section 47-2-60. After June 30, 2006, a person may not bring into possession a new exotic animal under the authority of a personal possession permit issued for another exotic animal that was in the person's legal possession as of July 1, 2006.
Section 47-2-70. The possessor of the exotic animal shall have an identification number placed in the exotic animal via subcutaneous microchip, at the expense of the possessor, by or under the supervision of a veterinarian. This section does not apply to an exotic animal if a veterinarian determines that the placement of a subcutaneous microchip would endanger the well-being of the exotic animal.
Section 47-2-80. (A) The department shall promulgate regulations establishing specific caging requirements for the keeping and confinement of exotic animals. Persons possessing exotic animals shall keep and confine the exotic animal in strict accordance with these caging requirements. Any deviation from the regulations must be approved by the department upon a showing of good cause.
(B) All caging requirements shall ensure that the exotic animal is confined in a primary enclosure that protects the public's safety and health and ensures the safety and well-being of the exotic animal. The caging requirements shall:
(1) set forth the minimum size of the cage for each species or family;
(2) require that the cage is locked or secured at all times when the exotic animal is kept in the cage;
(3) restrict the entry of unauthorized persons or predatory animals;
(4) maintain an ambient temperature compatible with the exotic animal's needs; and
(5) provide sufficient food and water which fulfills the exotic animal's dietary requirements and be presented in a manner compatible with the exotic animal's particular eating habits.
Section 47-2-90. (A) An exotic animal may not be:
(1) tethered, leashed, or chained outdoors or allowed to run at large;
(2) mistreated, neglected, abandoned, or deprived of necessary food, water, or sustenance.
(B) A person transporting an exotic animal in a vehicle shall keep the animal securely caged in the vehicle at all times.
(C) The possessor of an exotic animal shall have a plan for the quick and safe recapture of the exotic animal if the exotic animal escapes, and if recapture is impossible, a plan for the destruction of the exotic animal.
(D) If a person realizes that he can no longer care for the exotic animal, an animal rescue facility, wildlife sanctuary, or an American Zoo and Aquarium Association accredited facility must be contacted for possible placement of the animal before euthanization of the exotic animal.
Section 47-2-100. (A) A possessor of an exotic animal shall maintain liability insurance coverage in an amount of not less than one hundred thousand dollars for each occurrence for liability damages for destruction of or damage to property and death or bodily injury to a person caused by the exotic animal. The possessor of an exotic animal shall provide a copy of the policy for liability insurance to the department annually.
(B) The possessor of an exotic animal shall have posted and displayed at each possible entrance onto the premises where an exotic animal is kept a conspicuous sign, clearly legible, and easily readable by the public warning that there is an exotic animal on the premises. In addition, the possessor shall conspicuously display a sign with a warning symbol that informs children of the presence of an exotic animal. The exact content and size of the sign must be prescribed by the department.
(C) If any exotic animal escapes or is released, either intentionally or unintentionally, the possessor of the exotic animal immediately shall contact a law enforcement officer of the city or county where the possessor resides to report the escape or release. The possessor is liable for all expenses associated with efforts to recapture the animal.
Section 47-2-110. The possessor of an exotic animal may not bring an exotic animal to any commercial or retail establishment unless the possessor of the animal is bringing the animal to a veterinarian or a veterinarian clinic.
Section 47-2-120. The possessor of an exotic animal, at all reasonable times, shall allow the department to enter the premises where the animal is kept to ensure compliance with this chapter.
Section 47-2-130. (A) If the department finds that an applicant for an original or a renewal personal possession permit does not meet the requirements set forth in Section 47-2-50, the department shall deny the applicant a personal possession permit and give the applicant written notice of the denial and the reasons for the denial.
(B) If the department finds that a person has not complied with this chapter the department may suspend or revoke the personal possession permit and give the possessor written notice of the suspension or revocation and the reasons for the suspension or revocation.
(C) A person who is denied a personal possession permit or a renewal of a personal possession permit, or who has had a permit suspended or revoked may appeal the decision to an administrative law judge in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act.
Section 47-2-140. (A) An exotic animal may be immediately confiscated by the department if the:
(1) possessor does not have a personal possession permit issued pursuant to this chapter;
(2) possessor does not secure the liability insurance coverage required in Section 47-2-100;
(3) provisions of Section 47-2-100 are not being met;
(4) conditions under which the exotic animal is kept are directly or indirectly dangerous to human health and safety.
(B) An exotic animal may be returned to the possessor only if the possessor has a personal possession permit and has corrected the conditions resulting in the confiscation.
(C) If an exotic animal is confiscated, the possessor is liable for the costs of placement and care for the exotic animal from the time of confiscation until the time of return to the possessor or until the time the animal has been relocated to an alternative facility including, but not limited to, a wildlife sanctuary, licensed humane society, or an institution accredited by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association.
Section 47-2-150. (A) A person who violates a provision of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined two hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than thirty days and upon conviction of a second or subsequent offense, must be fined one thousand dollars, none of which may be suspended or remitted.
(B) A possessor of an exotic animal who violates Section 47-2-90(A)(1) or (B) or Section 47-2-110 resulting in the animal attacking and injuring a human being:
(1) for a first offense is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than three years;
(2) for a second or subsequent offense is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than ten thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than five years."
SECTION 2. This act takes effect July 1, 2006.
Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by Chris_Harper on January 2, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I'm looking on the list for "Privately Owned Venomous Snakes" as a cause of death in South Carolina, and I'm just not finding it!!! I wonder if the legislature is even going to consider this small tidbit or information, or if they will enact this law simply based on fear?
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/factsheets/ChronicDisease/south_carolina.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10389384&dopt=Abstract
http://www.sciway.net/statistics/scsa98/vs/vs7.html
Has the concept of "evidence based science/medicine" made it to the state house yet??? Wouldn't it be nice if we had some "evidence based legislation"? You South Carolina keepers better get organized now and get an articulate, educated spokesman to represent your point-of-view, or you'll be "de-snaked" within 7 months.
Chris Harper
|
|
Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by RepFan on January 3, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Chris,
Thank you so much for posting this on the site and putting it on the fore front so that it can easily been seen. The more help we can enlist in fighting this proposed ban the better.
~Todd
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by Chris_Harper on January 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
READ THAT LAW AGAIN!!! It will affect THOUSANDS of people in the state of South Carolina.
SO here's what you should do: Set up a non-profit to represent everyone impacted by this law in the State of South Carolina. You can call it - "The South Carolina Exotic Animal Alliance".
Then, set up a 4 or 5 page website with a downloadable membership application PDF file and a flyer soliciting membership based on your common goal. You also might as well consider keeping this organization going, because this legislation will show up over and over.
THEN, have the fliers printed up - they should say something like "Exotic Animal Keepers UNITE!!! Or lose your beloved pets!"
Put them in the windows of every pet store in the state. It should list EVERY animal species that will be impacted. It should also say, "Is your pet on this list?" Make sure your website address is on the flyer so they can download the membership application and send in membership fees of $10 to $25. You will need this money to operate.
Once you have built up a substantial membership, call for a meeting in a central location, like Columbia. I'm sure Roark will attend, so you'll have some good guidance to develop your gameplan.
South Carolina venomous keepers should unite under the banner of "Southeastern Hot Herp Society South Carolina Chapter" within that alliance - with my blessing of course.
What are you waiting for!?!? Get started!
Chris H.
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by Chris_Harper on January 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
The Yahoo Groups is a good place to find exotic animal owners on the net. For instance, Lemur owners have their own Yahoo Group.
http://dir.groups.yahoo.com/dir/Science/Biology/Animals/Mammals/Primates/Lemurs
~CH
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by Scott7590 on January 6, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Chris,
It would be helpful if you would post the Senator's mailing address.
Letters are much more effective than emails, which are routinely screened by staff and seldom make it to the Senator's desk.
Please send a brief email to ALL people registered on this web site. Let them know about letters rather than emails and remind them that Thomas is a Senator serving in the SC State Legislature, not a U. S. Senator serving the State in Washington.
I am going to write a letter to Senator Thomas and urge him to take a look at Florida's permit law for venomous reptiles.
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by bigsnakedaddy on January 6, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
This is bigger than just a venomous permit law. After the last go round with 4403 (now 959) we (State Animal Advisory Review Board) sat down and came up with a working model based on the the Florida model (ours is easier on the palate)formed a comittee that recieved thumbs up from rational SC people so affected. We were however able to defeat the bill and thus it was not desirable at the time (manpower/budget constraints) to implement even though I wanted it implemented to give us legitimacy immediately. The proposal is still intact and held in reserve. I must caution that that only helps a small field of people. The animal world in this state is very diversified and we are fighting a dirty eco-terrorist group who lives on rhetoric, misinformation, and is not dedicated to the truth. The fruitcakes at API and PETA will never rest because their passion and agendas are all they live for regardless of who gets in their way. Again well constructed letters to Senator Thomas and all members of the sc house and senate are necessary exposing API agenda and their anti hunting and fishing lobby. In a non-combative way let them know you are a registered voter and will vote against anyone who supports this bill on any level. Here is the bill. You can get the email address of all the members on the site. Get everyone involved. http://www.scstatehouse.net/sess116_2005-2006/bills/959.htm
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by Chris_Harper on January 6, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Have a look at the API's website:
http://www.api4animals.org/
They even keep up with legislation state by state!
http://www.api4animals.org/legislation_archive_state.php
These people are exactly what you South Carolina people aren't...........o.r.g.a.n.i.z.e.d!!!
Time to start that non-profit guys --The South Carolina Exotic Animal Alliance.
CH
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by bigsnakedaddy on January 7, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Thanks Chris. Everyone please cut and paste these addresses and place them in the to section of your email and let the people know how opposed you are to this insult to our intellect and intrusion on our rights:
SIV@scsenate.org <SIV@scsenate.org>; RA@scsenate.org <RA@scsenate.org>; BRYANTK@scsenate.org <BRYANTK@scsenate.org>; CAMPSEN@scsenate.org <CAMPSEN@scsenate.org>; CLEARYR@scsenate.org <CLEARYR@scsenate.org>; EDU@scsenate.org <EDU@scsenate.org>; CROMERR@scsenate.org <CROMERR@scsenate.org>; PTE@scsenate.org <PTE@scsenate.org>; DE@scsenate.org <DE@scsenate.org>; CP@scsenate.org <CP@scsenate.org>; RIF@scsenate.org <RIF@scsenate.org>; SFG@scsenate.org <SFG@scsenate.org>; SAG@scsenate.org <SAG@scsenate.org>; DH@scsenate.org <DH@scsenate.org>; set@scsenate.org <set@scsenate.org>; CBH@scsenate.org <CBH@scsenate.org>; DJ1@scsenate.org <DJ1@scsenate.org>; JAKE@scsenate.org <JAKE@scsenate.org>; JCL@scsenate.org <JCL@scsenate.org>; SFI@scsenate.org <SFI@scsenate.org>; PL@scsenate.org <PL@scsenate.org>; JBL@scsenate.org <JBL@scsenate.org>; MALLOYG@scsenate.org <MALLOYG@scsenate.org>; SRU@scsenate.org <SRU@scsenate.org>; JWM@scsenate.org <JWM@scsenate.org>; SJU@scsenate.org <SJU@scsenate.org>; JYM@scsenate.org <JYM@scsenate.org>; SGE@scsenate.org <SGE@scsenate.org>; TLM@scsenate.org <TLM@scsenate.org>; WHO@scsenate.org <WHO@scsenate.org>; KAY@scsenate.org <KAY@scsenate.org>; MED@scsenate.org <MED@scsenate.org>; CCP@scsenate.org <CCP@scsenate.org>; LR@scsenate.org <LR@scsenate.org>; GR@scsenate.org <GR@scsenate.org>; SR1@scsenate.org <SR1@scsenate.org>; JHR@scsenate.org <JHR@scsenate.org>; STR@scsenate.org <STR@scsenate.org>; SCOTTR@scsenate.org <SCOTTR@scsenate.org>; NGS@scsenate.org <NGS@scsenate.org>; VS@scsenate.org <VS@scsenate.org>; LHS@scsenate.org <LHS@scsenate.org>
Now the tedious work is done. The hard work is ahead. Please voice your concerns to the above listed members of the house and senate. Then tell everybody else who has an interest. Veterinarians, Pet shop owners, breeders of birds, cats, dogs, fish, reptiles, cattle, horses, and exotics. Set them on fire and get them to join us in this monumental assualt on our livlihoods. Best regards. Roark
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by Scott7590 on January 7, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hi Roark,
Hi Roark,
“I must caution that that only helps a small field of people.”
That may be true as it pertains to the portion of the bill concerning reptiles, but the bill covers other exotics, too. And even though reptile collectors may be relatively few in number, if collectors of other exotics are brought into the fold the total number swells dramatically.
As you know, API, HSUS, and PETA are after ALL of us who keep animals. I'm sure we are on their "hit list" because they think we're a soft target and y hope to get a "victory" at our expense. But you probably know as well as anyone that these zealots also "care" about anything that is alive (except humans). If they get their way, you’ll get arrested for swatting a fly while you’re eating your vegan lunch.
I am going to start writing letters (I already have one ready to go to Senator Thomas) in an effort to discredit the "animal rights" groups and, hopefully, deter legislators from supporting anything they advocate. When you look carefully at their web sites, they are propaganda machines that specialize in deceit and misinformation. If legislators see for themselves the kind of misinformation these groups spew out, they may think twice about supporting legislation the zealots propose. I don't think any elected official wants to be exposed for proposing or supporting legislation that is based on faulty or, particularly, false premises.
Someone (or, better yet, a bunch of people) with South Carolina addresses should contact Senator Thomas's office and request a record of all campaign contributions he has received from API, HSUS, PETA and any other "animal rights" groups. That should, at least, get him to scratch his head.
Regards,
Scott
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by MoccasinMan on January 10, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Roark makes some very good points. Something that should be researched is the trigger event that prompted this senator to sponsor the bill. Who put this bill in front of the senator... that is your animal rights activist within the state. Expose them for who they are. Expose their motives.You must expose this bills roots in the AR movement to the members of the legislature. It is quite possible that sen. Thomas and the others are unaware of the API/PETA connection. Here in NC not to many sen. were interested in being associated with a bunch of AR activists that were in favor of outlawing livestock farming, hunting, fishing, trapping and even family pets. This isn't California. Make sure these carpetbaggers are identified for who and what they are. The good citizens of SC will not be impressed when they find out who the legislators are in bed with. Feel free to contact me and i will show you the highly successful model we have used to fight the same bill here in NC. Roark has worked as an advisor to us and we would like to return the favor. We have started to turn the tide here in NC. Your future success would help set precidents and strengthen the model.
Andrew Wyatt
NC Association of Reptile Keepers
www.ncark.org (will be operational in a few days)
andrew@ncark.org
|
|
Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by Scott7590 on January 15, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I found an interesting paper on "How To Kill a Bill" on the Repticzone web site:
http://www.kc.net/~wolf2dog/killbill.htm
Andrew Wyatt makes a very good point about legislators not wanting to be linked to AR zealots.
There was an article about Pamela Anderson and her association with PETA posted on Yahoo the other day. I lambasted PETA on the discussion board and got a number of recommendations and supportive comments. It appears PETA has alienated a lot of people.
It's a lot easier to derail a bill than to get it amended or repealed after it becomes law, so let's all write letters to the legislators who may be favoring this piece of legislation. Even if has been tabled for the moment, it WILL be back.
Scott MacMillan
Boca Raton, FL
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by thedude on February 3, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
E. family lacertilia (Salvator monitors and Salvadoran monitors);
Um, Lacertilia is not a family and I am pretty sure there are no monitors in El Salvador (Salvadoran?), besides, I have known iguanas (and dogs)that are more dangerous to people than monitors!
Keep America AND its People FREE!
the dude
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by blacksheep on February 14, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hello ,
I know im not liked in the herp keeping world of south carolina ,but people do stupid things !thats not why im writeing ! i was asked by a friend ,to come and speak out about the new law that might be put into the rule books .so thats what i am doing ! some times people only make their minds up based on what the hear , so i think we should show that the herp keepers of sc are not back wood rednecks and can keep their pets in their homes and are not a risk to anyone or their pets (cats or dogs ) !and even that everyone as keepers are ready to stand up for our pets !if it even means putting ourselfs out in our citys and towns and asking for everyone to come as one !
schools ask people that keep reptiles and exotics to come and teach kids about them ! alot of the people that do that cannot pay the amount of money that this would ask of a keeper to pay to keep their amimals ! so in the end i think if we put everyone we can in this we will over come! thank you for reading
the( black sheep )Steven v Baker
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by blacksheep on February 14, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hello ,
i was asked by a friend ,to come and speak out about the new law that might be put into the rule books .so thats what i am doing ! some times people only make their minds up based on what the hear , so i think we should show that the herp keepers of sc are not back wood rednecks and can keep their pets in their homes and are not a risk to anyone or their pets (cats or dogs ) !and even that everyone as keepers are ready to stand up for our pets !if it even means putting ourselfs out in our citys and towns and asking for everyone to come as one !
schools ask people that keep reptiles and exotics to come and teach kids about them ! alot of the people that do that cannot pay the amount of money that this would ask of a keeper to pay to keep their amimals ! so in the end i think if we put everyone we can in this we will over come! thank you for reading
the( black sheep )
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by toddg on February 21, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
It seems to me the heart of this bill is the statement (....SO AS TO DEFINE EXOTIC ANIMAL AS THOSE SPECIES OF ANIMALS THAT ARE INHERENTLY DANGEROUS TO HUMANS). Forgive my ignorance but would't that include virtually every dog over say....50lbs.?? Look, it's not my state but wouldn't the senator's time be better served proposing some type of EXOTIC GUN bill? Or maybe an EXOTIC LUNG CANCER DERIVED FROM SMOKING TOO MANY CIGARETTES bill. Both of which pose a greater risk to public health and safety than exotic animals! Pehaps the senater has more to fear from gun and tobacco industries than the VERY POWERFULL exotic animal lobbiest and doesn't want to be precieved as "weak" and "ineffetual" during his term in office. As we've allready seen with drugs, making something illeagle isn't necessarily going to make it go away, it's just going to make criminals out of those who simply wish to care for something other than a dog or cat. Now, while I agree that "Billy Bob's Fireworks and Reptiles" shouldn't be selling "little timmy" a baby reticulated python, surely there are other ways of regulating exotic animal ownership than banning it alltogether!
|
|
RE: Proposed South Carolina Law
|
Reply
|
by blacksheep on March 8, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
hello every one hope your well and from what i have herd te bill didnt pass so thanks everyone who played a role in stopping it !!!!
|
|
|