|
11-12 of 12 messages
|
Previous
Page 2 of 2
|
|
RE: BC-Exotic animal regs don't go far enough, say
|
Reply
|
|
by AquaHerp on March 21, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Z-
I do see your view. I agree (believe it or not)with you to a large degree. I don't want my rights taken away either by someone who simply does not agree with my love for animals, many on the exotic side. I happen to have a nice collection of venomous snakes of my own and I am not ready to give these up without a fight.
I just think we have a better chance of convincing the masses without insulting a big percentage of them. I have always held that logic wins over fanatic most times.
Contrary to what you might think, I think that you do good things for the cause and have no "dislike" for you at all. I am simply saying, if it's toned down a bit and kept to the facts then it might fly farther.
DH
|
| |
|
RE: BC-Exotic animal regs don't go far enough, say
|
Reply
|
|
by tigers9 on March 21, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
AH, Trust me, I clean up well when going to NV legislature;-)I even wear black business suit as opposed to my normal bikini or jens/boots attire, see here, the blond in the middle:http://www.rexano.org//NewsArchivePages/CARSONCITY.pdf
z
|
| |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Manager.
|
