|
1-2 of 2 messages
|
Page 1 of 1
|
|
House Judiciary Committee Amends, Passes Python Bi
|
Reply
|
|
by tigers9 on July 29, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
http://www.petproductnews.com/headlines/2009/07/29/house-judiciary-committee-amends-passes-python-bill.aspx
House Judiciary Committee Amends, Passes Python Bill
Posted: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 5:45 p.m., EDT
The House Judiciary Committee on July 29 amended and passed HR 2811, a bill that would add Burmese pythons and African rock pythons to the Lacey Act as injurious species.
The bill, which would have added all pythons as originally written, now moves to the full House, which is not expected to act on it until September at the earliest, after its August recess.
If the bill passes into law, the Lacey Act would prohibit the import, export and interstate movement of the two python species. Reptile keepers, including the U.S. Association of Reptile Keepers, and pet industry members are expected to continue to work with legislators in an effort to further amend the bill to limit its trade restrictions to the importing of the two species. This would protect the existing commercial trade of captive-bred pythons.
The amendment, offered by Rep. Thomas Rooney (R-Fla), replaced the phrase “of the constrictor snake of the species Python genera” with the phrase “of the Burmese python of the species Python molurus bivattatus; of the African Rock Python of the species Python sebae.”
A related bill, S. 373, still sits in a Senate committee as originally written.
Even with the amendment, the bill would bypass the statuary listing process included in the Lacey Act, according to the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council. That process requires the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct a risk analysis and seek public comment before listing a species as “injurious.” The Fish and Wildlife Service is currently conducting such an analysis, PIJAC reports.
PIJAC warned concerned pet owners that the legislation, if passed as written, would set a dangerous precedent of adding controversial species to the Lacey Act without hearings and sufficient study. That precedent could affect owners of other pets, including birds, fish and turtles, PIJAC reported. <HOME>
Related article: House Judiciary Committee to Hear Python Ban Bill
|
| |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Manager.
|
