|
1-1 of 1 messages
|
Page 1 of 1
|
|
CA stuff
|
Reply
|
|
by tigers9 on September 22, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
http://www.rexano.org/StatePages/CaliforniaFrame.htm
2009 Legislation
F&G: New and proposed regulations homepage
Section 681, Title 14, CCR, Hybrid Animals and Plants: Proposed Adoption Date: November 5, 2009
1. Notice of Proposed Changes in Regulations September 1, 2009
<Snip>Potential examples are: a hybrid bass (i.e. largemouth and spotted bass that naturally occurs in a lake), hybrids of restricted exotic cats and non-restricted domestic cats, and hybrid canines such as coy-dogs (coyote and dog).<snip>
2. Initial Statement of Reason July 1, 2009
<Snip>Examples of potential problem areas include abalone, fin fish, falconry, waterfowl, aquaculture, and restricted species. The proposal would not only help regulate true hybrids but would help in preventing violators from using a “hybrid defense” by causing the Department to be forced to prove a specific animal is indeed a specific species and therefore regulated.<snip>
3. Proposed Regulatory Language
<Snip> when two or more provisions regulating a hybrid conflict with each other, the provision that provides the highest level of protection or that allows the most restrictive level of take, possession, size limit, or bag limit will supersede any other conflicting provisions.
<snip>
When the department determines that the animal or plant is a hybrid of a threatened, endangered, rare, or fully protected species and further determines that the level of protection is not reasonably extended to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Endangered Species Act, or provisions of these regulations and the Fish and Game Code dealing with threatened, endangered, rare, or fully protected species.
<snip>
******************
|
| |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Manager.
|
