|
1-5 of 5 messages
|
Page 1 of 1
|
|
Nat Geo arguement against USGS (link)
|
Reply
|
|
by venomrob on March 13, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Nat Geo basically says the USGS is full S***...
http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/news/chiefeditor/2010/03/climate-matching-predictions-giant-snakes-exagerrated.html
Rob
|
| |
|
RE: Nat Geo arguement against USGS (link)
|
Reply
|
|
by Cro on March 14, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Yep, and National Geographic is absolutely right !
Best Regards
John Z
|
| |
|
RE: Nat Geo arguement against USGS (link)
|
Reply
|
|
by FSB on March 14, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
A voice of reason from inside the beltway... gotta love NG. Great time-lapse photo of a coral snake in the current issue. At first glance it looks like a strand of DNA.
|
| |
|
RE: Nat Geo arguement against USGS (link)
|
Reply
|
|
by dizzl on March 21, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
The funny thing about this is that they put it out after they aired an episode of Explorer called "Python Wars" http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/series/explorer/4817/Overview
The only thing that they said in this episode that made sense was that they have proof that most of the snakes bloodlines trace back to the facilities that were destroyed in hurricain Andrew!!
|
| |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Manager.
|
