|
21-26 of 26 messages
|
Previous
Page 3 of 3
|
|
RE: More bad press
|
Reply
|
|
by Ptk on August 19, 2011
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
IF this is a labeling issue.... I have never understood why "law enforcement" jumps right to seizure of private property? If they were legal snakes and its a matter of labels, or record keeping, caging, etc.
Seems the more effective approach is to issue a warning and give the man X number of days to correct the violation - based upon re-inspection either a fine, termination of permit (if any) and lastly a seizure of property. This is done everyday for vicious dogs and other "pets".
If no building code violations - then let the man live in a oil drum if he wants to. Too many people live beyond their means already!!
|
| |
|
RE: More bad press
|
Reply
|
|
by agkistrodude on August 20, 2011
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Someone told me, and it's just hearsay, I didn't bother to research it, that in NC, under law, if your animal(s) cause harm to person or property more than once, the authorities can confiscate them. This was his second bite. So they took them. Again, I did not research this to verify it, as I don't live in NC and I'm not concerned with their current laws. Take care, MArty
|
| |
|
RE: More bad press
|
Reply
|
|
by Ptk on August 22, 2011
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Thanks Marty,
That would make more sense if this bite was not the first - especially if it were the same snake. I still have problem if they seized all his snakes. If your car has no tag they dont go to your house take your wifes car, boat, etc.
|
| |
|
RE: More bad press
|
Reply
|
|
by Crotalusssp on August 22, 2011
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
It was indeed his second bite. The first was a copperhead several years (at least) ago. This bite was a different snake and species.
|
| |
|
RE: More bad press
|
Reply
|
|
by kacz on August 23, 2011
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
At the beginning of this thread some people expressed their opinions about Mr. Kidd living in a trailer. My problem with this story is that Mr. Kidd did not live in the trailer! He was, according to the story, living with his girlfriend and going to the trailer once or twice a week to feed the reptiles. I have a huge problem with this. If you have a zoo or collection that is housed in a building specifically equipped to contain a hazardous menagerie, great. No problem. You have safeguards, warning and alert systems, and a protocol for being there to take care of any problems. But to house venomous snakes in a structure like a mobile home, and then to leave that structure unattended for long periods of time is an act of reckless disregard for others. If you are going to maintain a collection of hazardous animals it should be your responsibility to provide constant vigilance and response in the event of an emergency.
Suppose some kids break in. Suppose a venomous snake gets out. Who knows what weird unexpected thing could happen? In fact, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Mr. Kidd's bite was precipitated by his haste in getting back to his life away from the trailer. If you have a venomous collection it is your responsibility 24/7.
Kacz
|
| |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Manager.
|
